Saturday, October 25, 2008

I-1000 Death with Dignity

Countless times people have fought so hard for a never-ending battle of life vs. death, and too often death is the one that wins this battle. People on their last six months to live have to suffer through what is a horribly painfull ordeal. They are most of the time bed-ridden and in pain. Why not give these people a choice? Why not let them go without pain or suffering? These people deserve better. These people deserve their dignity.

 

These patients that want to overdose aren’t just average people. They have to be terminally ill with sex months to live. This is almost warrants that the patien will not be able to survive so that if they are in too much pain, they will be able to consult a doctor to end their life. Its their life, it should be their decesion, not that of the government. Also, in terms of safety, the patient has to go through two different doctors to be ok. The patient and a 14 day waiting period to think about if this is really the right choice for them. Also, if the doctors determinethis patient is clinically depressed, then that patient has to go  has to go through a phsiciatrist and go through counseling before the medication is prescribed for them. This normally is a very peacefull death because it on average takes 25 minutes to die and during this time they can have their family with them or have a peaceful quiet time.

 

Tony miller is a man who traveled the world seeing new things and living the way he wanted to live and writing about his life. Now, because of his prostate cancer, he has to stay in a box of a home in oregen all cooped up and stuck. He has to change three times a day because of how much he sweats. He moved to oregen because of their death with dignity law. When asked about the opportunity to put this is law into action, he said “I will keep living but when the pain becomes too much, I will use it”. Tony is just like many people in oregon or who have moved to Oregon because they don’t want to live a life that is full of pain and sadness.

 

 

If passed, initiative 1000 would be a horrible law. Life is a gift, and should never be willfully destroyed, as I-1000 proposes. This initiative would allow people who are considered terminally ill to end their life prematurely, without even so much as notification of their families. Very few spouses would want to learn that their husband or wife had killed themselves, without even discussing it over with them. A suicide not only destroys the life of the victim, but also the lives touched by the victim as well. For example, a young girl killed herself due to mental depression. After the death, her parents divorced and Dad became an alcoholic, losing his job and gambling away his life savings. There are many stories like this, and making assisted suicide a legal practice would only increase these types of tragedies.

 

Chris Carlson, 65, was told in early 2005 that he had six months to live. Now, in 2008, Carslon is fighting against I-1000, death with dignity. He says that doctors are often wrong when predicting life expectancy. He would know this first hand, as he has lived almost 18 wonderful months more than expected.  This should tell people that no matter how much you trustu your doctor, he can be wrong. A person can due unbelievable things when there is a strong will to survive. Some people even embrace their time period and try to make the most of it, instead of sitting and waiting for their death to come.  For example, Duane French is very much paralyzed, and very much against I-1000 as well. While people have told French that they would “rather be dead than suffer like he is,” French is determined to make the most of what he has. He admits that at first he was suicidal, but “you come through that,” he says. “Every moment of life is precious”. He is arguing against sending people to an early, unnatural death because he understands the joys of life, even in a wheel chair or hospital bed.

 

While the numbers of cases of physician-assisted suicides continue to rise each year, with over 350 cases in the last year alone, fewer than 100 doctors are involved in writing the prescriptions. One doctor in opposition to the law says he “believes in death with dignity, but not in empowering doctors to give massive overdoses so that patients can kill themselves.”  In washington, doctors would not be able to physically administer the drugs, only write the prescription. However, a family member would be able to help the patient take the drugs if the patient is too weak to take the medication by themselves. This puts a great stress on the family member, who is assisting a suicide, which is also an illegal act. To sum things up, death by a prescribed overdose should not be considered a death with dignity, it is suicide. 



Konner and Michael

Friday, October 3, 2008

True/False Statements

Biden

1. Mccain voted for tax increase 477 times
2. Mccain give 300 billion tax cuts for wealthy and big business
3. It will take 10 years for new oil to be produced
4. He has supported clean coal for 25 years
5. There will be no legal difference between same sex and heterosexual couple





Palin
1. Oamba/biden voted for largest tax increase in history
2. Obama voted for tax increase on 42,000 income families
3. Palin eliminated property tax in Alaska
4. Mccain proposing a 5000 healthcare credit
5. Circulating 700 billion in foreign countries


The red statements are false and the green statements are true

Debates

Both the presidential and vice presidential debates were very exciting to watch. In the presidential debate, many strong points were made on both sides however it was difficult at times to sift through the politics and understand the position of the candidates. At the end of the debate, it was unclear if there was a definite winner. McCain spoke very directly and plainly which appeals to some people, but Obama spoke with eloquence and intelligence which is also appealing. If I had to choose a winner, I would have to side with John McCain because he spoke more directly and succinctly in the debate.

McCain Habit of mind- Striving for Accuracy.
McCain kept his side of the arguments to a very straight talk. He didn't try to mix up his positions too much

Obama Habit of mind- Metacognition
It was easy to see that during the debate, Obama was thinking about what he was saying and thinking about what he was going to say next. This enabled him to appear very smart.


In the vice presidential debate, I think that the political winner was Joe Biden. He was in control and was very quick with bringing up facts that refute the previous point made by Sara Palin. However, I think that Palin made up a lot of ground in terms of her appearing unable to assume the responsibility of vice president. In the end, I would say that Joe Biden was a more skilled debator but Sara Palin became more appealing to the American People.

Biden habit of mind- Persistence
Biden was always ready with a counter point to whatever Palin said. He appeared to be very in control and very persistent in his approach to the debate.

Palin habit of mind- Communicating with Clarity and Precision
Palin spoke very directly and to the point. She didn't worry about making herself sound smart, she just made herself sound to the point. I think people will like that about her.

VP Facts

Biden

1. Mccain voted for tax increase 477 times
2. Mccain give 300 billion tax cuts for wealthy and big business
3. It will take 10 years for new oil to be produced
4. He has supported clean coal for 25 years
5. There will be no legal difference between same sex and heterosexual couple





Palin
1. Oamba/biden voted for largest tax increase in history
2. Obama voted for tax increase on 42,000 income families
3. Palin eliminated property tax in Alaska
4. Mccain proposing a 5000 healthcare credit
5. Circulating 700 billion in foreign countries